AN EVALUATION OF UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN IN TRANSHUMANIST AND POST-HUMANIST APPROACHES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF EXISTENTIALIST PHILOSOPHY
AN EVALUATION OF UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN IN TRANSHUMANIST AND POST-HUMANIST APPROACHES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF EXISTENTIALIST PHILOSOPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18289255Keywords:
Transhumanism, Transhuman, Post-Humanism, Posthuman, Biotechnology, Artifical Intelligence Technology, Existentialist Philosophy.Abstract
The artistic, cultural, and philosophical foundations of the concepts of transhumanism and posthumanism date back several centuries. However, since the early 21st century, these concepts have become increasingly prevalent in the literature, particularly in parallel with rapid advancements in scientific fields such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and artificial intelligence, and have increasingly become subjects of discussion in philosophical contexts. Rooted in science and technology, both concepts of transhumanism and posthumanism emerge as two distinct yet interconnected philosophical and cultural approaches that focus on the future of humanity and the limits of human-centered thought.
The concepts of transhumanism and posthumanism, which constitute the focus of this study, share a common stance in the idea of transforming humanity and reconstructing the notion of the technological human. The most fundamental difference between the two lies in the way they approach technology: while transhumanism views the technological age as a tool in the process of human development, posthumanism not only employs it as a tool but seeks to fully integrate the human with the technological age. Particularly, unlike humanism, posthumanism does not adopt a human-centered perspective. It critiques all humanist approaches and cultural assumptions that attribute uniqueness to the human and position the human above other beings.
At this point, in the age of artificial intelligence and advanced technology, the entity that emerges, part human, part machine, at the culmination of the transhumanist process is referred to as the ‘posthuman.’ While the transhuman can be described as the transitional form between Homo sapiens and the posthuman, the posthuman represents the being reached at the end of this transformative process. Contrary to these two technologically centered conceptions of the human, existentialist philosophy places the human at the center, emphasizing the principle that existence precedes essence, and that the conscious human constructs themselves through free and deliberate actions. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the understanding of the human found in transhumanist and posthumanist approaches, both of which center on the technologically enhanced human, particularly within the context of artificial intelligence, through the fundamental concepts and principles of existentialist philosophy.
References
Aslan Y. H., (2016). “Bir Derleme: Benlik Kavramına İlişkin Bazı Yaklaşımlar ve Tanımlamalar”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sayı: 48:79-89.
Aytepe, M. (2025). “Transhümanizmde İnsanın Bütünlüğü Sorunu”, İslami İlimler Dergisi, 40: 389-407.
Başak, A., Posthümanizm - Kavram Kuram Bilim-Kurgu. Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2020.
Braidotti, R., İnsan Sonrası Bilgi, Çev. Seyram Sam-Eda Çaça, Kolektif Kitap, İstanbul, 2019.
Dağ, A., “Önsöz”, Din ve Transhümanizm, (ed. Talip Demir), Eski Yeni Yayınları, Ankara, 2021.
Dağ, A., Transhümanizm: İnsanın ve Doğanın Dönüşümü, Elis Yayınları/Ankara, 2018.
Dağ, A., İnsansız Dünya: Transhümanizm, Ketebe Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020.
Demir, A. (2018). “Ölümsüzlük ve Yapay Zekâ Bağlamında Trans-Hümanizm”, AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 9(31), 95-104.
Doğan, H., (2024). “İnsan Olmanın Anlamı ve Anlamsızlığı: Posthümanist Sanatın Romantik Estetiği”, Art Vision, 30(53): 187-196.
Dvorsky, G. and Hughes, J. (2008). Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary. Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies.
Francesca. F., (2013). “Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms Differences and Relations”. An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and Arts. Sayı 8, 26-32.
Foulquie, P., Varoluşçunun Varoluşu, Çev. Yakup Şahan, Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayınları, İstanbul, 2002.
Gacar, H. A., (2024). “Hümanizm, Post-hümanizm ve Trans-hümanizm’in Sinemada Temsili: I, Robot Filmi Örneği”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Araştırma Dergisi, 24: 81-104.
More, Max (2010). “The Overhuman in the Transhuman”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21:1-4.
Köktürk, M., Dijital Çağ Üzerine Düşünceler, Net Kitaplık Yayıncılık/ Ankara, 2021.
Nick Bostrom, N., “The Transhumanist Faq” Published by the World Transhumanist Association, 2003.
Nietzsche, F., Böyle Buyurdu Zerdüşt, Çev. Mert Hüseyin Ergül, Erasmus Yayınları, İstanbul, 2018.
Nietzsche, F., Ecco Homo, Çev. Tolga Eraslan, Sis Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2014.
Robert Ranisch ve Stefan L. Sorgner, ed., Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction, Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt, 2014.
Sartre, J. P., Varlık ve Hiçlik: Fenomenolojik Ontoloji Denemesi (1.baskı). Çev. T. Ilgaz. İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul, 2021.
Schneıder, S., Yapay Sen (Yapay Zeka ve Zihnin Geleceği), Çev. Tülay Tosun, Tellekt, İstanbul, 2022.
Şengel, B., Edebiyatta Transhümanizm ve Posthümanizm, Gece Kitaplığı, Ankara, 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academy International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.